Foster Care Service Plan: Part A
Court File No: JJ-198958
Oasis Case No: 20030847
Case Name: Styles
Date Prepared: June 21, 2011
Date Filed: June 27, 2011
The Code of Virginia requires the involvement of birth parents/prior custodians, foster parents, and the child (where applicable) in the mutual development of the Service Plan. [I was the legal guardian, my mother has been the custodian of David almost since he was born but we are not a party to the case and we are not involved in the service plan]. Part A should reflect the involvement and responsibility of the parties mentioned above. Part A is to be distributed to all involved.
Child: David J. Styles Birthdate: 03/24/2009
Reason for New Service Plan: Initial Service Plan/Dispositional Service Plan: Hearing
Date of most recent removal from own home: 05/04/2011 [David was removed from Ritz Carlton Hotel in Philadelphia on 05/05/2011]
Date of custody: 05/04/2011
Official Custody: Emergency Removal
Custody Disposition: DSS Custody
Legal Basis for Custody: Abuse/Neglect [Judge Dugger said that even though David was not abused or neglected based off of testimony of multiple social workers and police officers, he would still find David abused and neglected. Philadelphia PD Officer Harvey, who saw David with no clothes on, said that David was completely fine. Officer Davis, who also saw David with no clothes on, because he had just gotten of the tub, said nothing contrary.]
Program Goal: Return to Own Home/Concurrent Goal: Relative Placement
Target Date for Achievement: 06/21/2012 [Please note that they intend to keep David for at least a year]
1. Discuss how and why child came into care.
On March 21, 2011 Virginia Beach Child Protective Services (CPS) received a referral regarding the alleged Physical Neglect (Inadequate Supervision) of an unknown 2-year-old child by his mother, India Styles. [If anyone knows India especially by name, they know her child's name. He's the topic of all of her conversations. Which goes back to what I said in my first entry-that a person who does not know India or David still had the exact address and name of India and David...also please note, the people holding India's belongings only know her by the name Jennifer] The report alleged that the child was observed the previous Friday, March 18, 2011, to be unsupervised in the condominium parking lot for approximately 10 minutes. The child allegedly was only wearing pants and shirt.[What was a child supposed to be wearing, it was a sunny day. Also, they continuously use the word 'alleged'] The mother then "dragged the child" back inside the house. The report further indicated that there was yelling and screaming at the home at "all hours of the day and night" including at 2:30am. Social Worker (SW) Lapid responded to 3520 Dublin Court, Virginia Beach, Virginia 23453, which was the address listed in the referral. SW Lapid arrived at the home and Tiffany Hartley answered the door. [uh-oh. You remember what I said about Tiffany, right? Let me also state about Tiffany that she is legally mentally handicapped and her mother receives SSI for her. Tiffany is 27 yo.] Ms. Hartley indicated she resided in the home with the 2-year-old child, David Styles [how did she 'indicate' such information?], and his mother, India Styles. She also indicated there were two other roommates who resided in the home by the name of Michelle and Bob, last names unknown. [Once again, India did not live here. She has resided in North Carolina since she turned 18 in January] SW Lapid asked Ms. Hartley the whereabouts of India Styles and she had indicated that India Styles just left to go to the grocery store and did not know when she would return. SW Lapid was denied entry into the home to see the child. [You know what they say about inviting vampires into your home? No lie, the same goes for social workers] The mother of the child, India Styles, age 18, fled the home after the SW Lapid's visit. [Really? Where did she get this information? Did she see India fleeing the home? Which home? The one in North Carolina, where she was? Bravo]
India Styles has had previous involvement with CPS. On November 10, 2008, India was charged with assault on a family member, involing [learn to spell] her biological mother, Charlotte Styles and biological sister, Emalia Styles, in the Hampton Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court. [In case you all forgot, I am Emalia Styles. I wasn't there that day. They actually mean my sister Jerrus (Joey) Shoup, but they just had to throw my name in there somehow, I guess] India Styles was placed in Secure Detention. Upon her release from detention, her mother refused to allow her to return to the home [New lie. Mom actually asked for services for India because she was concerned for her safety. The courts decided to place India in foster care] reporting that she was not willing to participate in services [once again, my mom is the one who asked for the services], to include, in-home therapeutic counseling [In SW speak, that means having a worker hired from a private agency through social services coming into our home--I'm sure you can imagine that none of us were okay with that], Healthy Start for India and her unborn child [a program our mother signed her up for], and the outreach program via Hampton Juvenile Court Services. India and her mother were linked with the Family Stabilization program, however, during her court dispositional, India Styles was adjudicated into foster care as a part of her disposition for the criminal charges [meaning they found India delinquent and thought the best thing would be to put her back into the system with the very people that denied her services and made her delinquent]. The court found that continued placement in the home was contrary to the best interest of India Styles [even though Judge Taylor said that he wasn't going to do what was in the best interest of the child per some Williamsburg ruling the prior month-completely unrelated to India].
India Styles remained in foster care until age 18. At that time, she refused to continue in foster care and was discharged from foster care just prior to moving to Virginia Beach [once again, India informed workers and court that she was moving to North Carolina] with her son, David. SW Lapid made repeated attempts to contact India Styles, but was unsuccessful. India Styles has taken David from place to place in an effort to evade CPS. [where does this information come from? India only lived in one place. Is this just guessing on SW Lapid's part? Where are her verifiable sources of information?] On May 2, 2011, India Styles emerged [pause...'emerged?' They left out the fact that they had already spoken with India on April 25, 2011 and that India confirmed David was not in the state and that...once again...she resided in NC] for a court hearing in the Hampton court on an appeal for a criminal conviction (assault of a police officer and assault of a family member). India Styles met with SW and refused to tell SW about David's whereabouts. [I hate to keep repeating myself, but once again, India met with SW Lapid -I was present- on April 25th. She did not speak with SW at all on May 2] The judge made it a condition of India Styles' bond that she advise her prior Hampton foster care worker, David's location. [Missing a few words there? Okay, I'll quit picking on their stupidity...or try anyway] The judge [Taylor] gave India until 9am on May 3, 2011 to make the notification. Ms Styles refused to give information about where David could be found. [Negative: India was advised May 2 by her attorney Alexander Suhli to not violate her fifth amendment right; on May 3, Suhli explained to Judge Taylor that even though he didn't believe India should give any information, she was prepared to say what she knows--that David was in Pennsylvania with Mom even though she did not have a direct phone number or address. Judge Taylor said he didn't care and it was too late and arrested her] The judge revoked Ms. Styles' bond and she was placed in jail on May 3, 2011.
SW Lapid staffed the case and it was determined that a petition would be filed requesting an emergency removal [based on what grounds? Alleged reports?] On May 4, 2011, SW filed a petition for an emergency removal order in the Hampton Juvenile and Domestic Court. The Virginia Beach Human Services was awarded custody of David May 4, 2011. [Hold on...I thought we were in Hampton...How could CPS for Virginia Beach be granted custody?] CPS and the Hampton police followed every possible lead in an effort to locate David. [Meaning they followed me home and banged on the door of all my known friends] Social Workers [Okay, I know I said I wouldn't nitpick but why do they have their titles capitalized like they're gods?] and police visited homes in Hampton, Newport News, Norfolk and Virginia Beach in making attempts to locate David. Leads were followed up on in North Carolina, Texas and Pennsylvania. David was located in Philadelphia on May 5, 2011. He was placed in protective c [yes it stopped right there]
2. Describe DSS and other agency services to prevent removal. If no services given, explain why.
Virginia Beach Human Services was awarded custody of David Styles on May 4, 2011. David was considered missing and in danger until he was found in Philadelphia on May 5, 2011. [Okay, what indication did anyone have that David was in danger?] He was found with maternal grandmother, Charlotte Styles. Charlotte Styles was arrested for abduction [when was she ever told she couldn't have David? I didn't tell her that. India didn't tell her that, either] and David was taken into custody by Philadelphia CPS. India Styles remained in jail until her release on May 18, 2011. Services had previously been offered to India Styles by Hampton DSS. India was non-compliant. [I'm sorry. I remember Judge Dugger reprimanding Hampton DSS in open court for not providing India the services she needed and for failing as a child protective agency] Virginia Beach CPS was unable to offer services, as India was non-compliant and was evading CPS. [What is 'non-compliant?' And is she evading you if you're just too stupid to find her? It's not like she had a lot of friends or went a lot of places. Hell, for 2 weeks she was in jail. Or was she evading you there, too?]
3. Describe child's situation at the time placement occurred or custody transferred. Information relative to family, health and education must be addressed.
David Styles (age 2) was located in Philadelphia on May 5, 2011. He had been last seen with maternal grandmother, Charlotte Styles. Charlotte Styles was arrested for abduction on May 5, 2011. At the time of placement in foster care, his mother, India Styles, was incarcerated at the Hampton City jail. [Now let me get this straight: On May 3, you put the mother in jail. On May 5, you put the grandmother and custodian in prison. Where was he supposed to go now, besides to you, since he had family in PA that you wouldn't give him to?] She was charged with felony assault and battery on a police officer and was sentenced to 12 months in jail with 11 months suspended. [But that's not why India was in jail. India was in jail because she couldn't give the information they were for. She didn't know it. But she was ready to perjure herself just not to go to jail] India Styles is diagnosed with Adjustment Disorder [You mean she wasn't able to adjust to going to foster care as a little girl and being abused with no recourse, and then having to go through it all again just a few later? Oh, gosh. She has issues] with mixed disturbances of emotions and conduct and neglect of child victim issues [the issues you gave her that the appellate court recognized] and Personality Disorder Not Otherwise Specified (Paranoid Traits) [In case you guys didn't know, that's called a Wastebasket diagnosis which means she was given a fake diagnosis for non-medical reasons...Google it. And also it means they just don't like her] According to India Styles, she and Charlotte Styles have gone back and forth with caring for David since he was born [How could that be true if she was in foster care and her foster mother Barbara Douglas would not give India permission to have David stay with her]; however, Charlotte Styles has been the main caretaker for David since he was born. On May 6, 2011, SW Jennifer Lapid and SW Hannah Brown flew to Philadelphia and brought David back to Virginia Beach. [Philadelphia DHS made no report of abuse regarding David] Upon meeting David, he immediately smiled and said, "hi" to SWs. He went to SWs without incident and only cried when he was unable to run around or was re-directed for hitting or throwing things [That was completely outside of David's character. He loved his toys. He did not throw them] David had a visible scratch on the left side of his face, about 2 inches long. He also had several other scratches on both his legs near his ankles and his stomach. [Where did these scratches come from? Philadelphia Officers Harvey and Davis saw him completely nude and did not report any such marks on David. When did this happen to him? Certainly, not in the care of Charlotte Styles] It appeared as though David may have scratched himself as SWs observed his nails to be long. [How could that be when David was a well-groomed child?] David also had 2, possibly 3, missing teeth on the bottom right side of his mouth. It is unknown what happened to those teeth. [Actually it was the bottom front TWO teeth. Also, on June 15, my mother and I met with workers Jennifer Lapid and Sharon Hosea. Sharon Hosea questioned Mom about David's teeth and she gave a...dissertation about the incident--Halloween (I describe it in my first entry). So why on June 21, 6 days later, are they saying they do not know what happened? Even though there are medical reports to confirm] It was reported that David was allergic to milk. SW Lapid and SW Brown were presented with 2 cans of Gerber Soy Milk powdered formula (0-12 months) and one packet of baby food. [Are you saying that the Philadelphia officials did not provide David with the proper nutrition once he was out of Mom's care? Also, after SWs were informed that David was allergic to milk, they decided to taunt India by telling her they had given it to him any (Thanks Ophelia Watley)] David did not have any other clothes except the shorts, t-shirt and jacket he was wearing. [Why would he have any other clothes since David and Mom were staying with my aunt and she was only staying at the hotel for the day...for fun] It was also unknown whether or not David was up-to-date on his immunizations and/or if had ever had any medical care. [I guess you should have asked, then]
4. Describe Placement:
a. Type of Placement
Foster Home, Non-relative [Wait, I thought India, then relative was the goal. Where were these efforts exerted?]
b.1. Describe efforts made to locate and place child with absent father,
maternal relatives and paternal relatives (throughout the life of the case
as appropriate).
b.2. Describe efforts which have been made to place the child in the least
restrictive (most family-like) setting available, consistent with the best
interests and special needs of the child.
b.1. On May, 17, 2011, Sharon Hosea, VBDHS Foster Care Social Worker, and
Gwendolyn Corbin, VBDHS Social Work Assistant, met with India Styles at the
Hampton City jail. India was informed of her son's placement in foster care and
provided a VBDHS Parent Information Booklet. India Styles was explained, in detail, t this agency's responsibility to provide her with services and the support needed to
assist her in gaining her child's custody. She was cooperative, inquisitive and pleasant duiring the meeting. India Styles was asked to provide information regarding
relatives to allow this agency to explore placement options for David. India explained
that her mother, Charlotte Styles, had been the primary caretaker for David and
recommended David be placed back in her care. [That just goes to show you how confident India was in Mom's caretaking abilities] India Styles was
informed of her mother's current incarceration, which involved David's abduction.
[That goes to show how David was never abducted by Mom, at least not
according to his mother] It should also be noted that Charlotte Styles has had all h her children removed from her care in the past by Virginia Beach DHS and Hampton
DHS. [I just want to point out that is a blatant lie. Only 4 of us were
removed, me, Carri, India, and Toulle. The first time was kidnapping, as
I've previously explained, and the 2nd time it was only India, as we just covered] Charlotte Styles currently has a child, Devon Styles [You mean, Toulle,
you jerks?] (12), in foster care throught VBDHS. There is a termination of parental rights hearing for Devon in August 2011 in VB Circuit Court. [We'll touch on that later] During the time India Styles was in foster care, a parental capacity evaluation was conducted with Charlotte Styles. The results of the evaluation indicated there were serious concerns regarding Charlotte Styles' mental health and her ability to effectively parent India Styles. [I don't know if any of you read the
kidjacked.com article I posted in my first entry, but it clearly states that every time DHS hires someone to do an 'evaluation' on my mom she has mental health issues. When an unbiased psychiatrist conducts one,
however, (unrelated to DHS) she is perfectly fine minus the distress she
must cope with whenever DHS enters her life] Supervised visitation and careful
monitoring of visits between India Styles and her mother, Charlotte Styles, was
recommended. Also, Charlotte Styles failed to ensure that her daughter, India Styles,
attended school regularly. India Styles had not attended school since the 5th grade.
[More lies. India last attended 6th grade at Syms middle school, refused to
go, so Mom then put her in an alternative school for troubled children. Another indication Mom was searching for help with India. Hampton
City Schools administration fielded the paperwork for India to be accepted at Hampton Harbor Academy because HDSS refused to help]
India Styles was informed that her maternal aunt, Linda Benjamin, contacted VBDHS,
requesting to care for David. Ms. Benjamin was provided a homestudy packed, a
request for criminal background search and instructed to complete these forms prior to this agency scheduling an interview. As of the writing of this report, Ms. Benjamin had not contacted this agency or provided the required documents to begin her homestudy. On June 22, 2011, this worker contacted Ms. Benjamin to inquire [I thought this report was prepared June 21, 2011 so how are you writing what happened June 22 in the report? That doesn't make any sense] as to her readiness to begin her homestudy. She indicated that she had not completed the forms submitted to her and would contact the agency upon her completion of the documents. When India Styles was placed in foster care, Ms. Benjamin requested to be a placement option for her. Ms. Benjamin retracted her offer following a visit with India Styles, stating that her defiant behaviors were beyond her ability to provide and meet her needs. [Another lie. Aunt Linda never had a visit with India]
b.2. David is placed in a foster home, which is the least restrictive, family-like setting.
[How can this be the least restrictive, when he was never under any
restriction when he was not subject to foster care? He could have been
home with family members]
c. Describe the efforts to place the child in closest proximity to parent's home.
David is placed in a foster home in the Hampton Roads area.
[Hampton Roads is Chesapeake, Virginia Beach, Norfolk, Suffolk, Newport News, Hampton, and Portsmouth. How many cities is he away
from his mother? She lives in North Carolina. Why not have the case
transferred there? When Mom got David from Texas, she brought him to
Hampton where India was. She could have kept him in Texas, then they would have never had him]
5. Describe how any court orders made in respect to this child are being addressed.
On May 4, 2011(ERO), the Hampton Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court ordered that David Styles be remanded into the custody of VBDHS. [By Judge Dugger. If Virginia Beach had jurisdiction or any rightful claim to David, why didn't they get a VB judge to grant an ERO? Why didn't the Hampton courts grant custody to Hampton DHS? Does any of this make sense?]
On May 5, 2011(PRO), the Hampton Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court ordered temporary legal custody of Davis Styles [I love how they continuously change our kids names. On the subpoenas for court it says 'David Joseph Styles'. His name is David Joshua] The court appointed Robert Boester as David's GAL, Mark Williams as India Styles counsel and Christina James as the unknown father's attorney [When I attended court on 5/31, the 'unknown father's attorney' was a man...maybe it was a man named Christina, though]
On May 31, 2011 (Adjudicatory Hearing), the Hampton Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court ordered that David's custody remain with VBDHS with India Styles having a finding of abuse and neglect. [I have made it a point to attend all of India's court hearings. When Hampton Police Department was searching for David, they guaranteed India immunity. Because Judge Dugger could not find India guilty of any charges regarding David, and India was not being charged with anything, he only found David abused and neglected, even though all of the prosecutor's witness and agents testified repeatedly that David was not abused nor neglected. So why does this report say that India was found guilty of abuse and neglect? Once again, A COMPLETE AND BLATANT LIE. OMG. Forgive my anger, you have to understand how upsetting this is for me. I didn't pre-read this. I'm going line by line and getting more distraught by the minute] The court noted the following facts: Child was left unsupervised. When VBDHS attempted to investigate, the child was secretly [WHAT THE F....Secretly??? Are you serious, you fricking mongoloids??] transferred to the maternal grandmother, Charlotte Styles, who hid and transferred the child to Pennsylvania. [I'm sorry, I'm sure this is hard to read with all of my interruptions, but do you see what they are saying? They just said Mom had him since he was born. How then are they saying that only when they were looking for him did she secretly take, hide, and transfer him to PA? Remember I said Mom left in February??] Charlotte Styles has been previously found to be unfit and suffers from severe mental problems. [If she was so unfit and suffered severe mental problems (that was proved to be untrue by THREE psychiatrists by the way), how is it that she got 3 of her children back? Please, oh Lord, someone please explain that to me] The court also ordered the transfer of David's case to Virginia Beach Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court for all future Proceedings.
6. Mechanisms for ensuring the proper care of child:
a. Identify the needs which must be met to achieve the goal for the child. (Include discussion of parent(s)/prior custodian(s) visitation.)
Prior to David returning home to his mother, India Styles is required to complete the following:
-Parenting capacity evaluation with a psychological component to determine levels of
impairment and ability; and comply with resulting recommendations,
-Attend scheduled supervised visits [none have been scheduled for her yet] to affirm
boundaries and healthy bonding and development, and abide by the guidelines and
expectations of the process,
-Maintain regular contact with VBDHS, GAL and her counsel and keep the agency informed of her whereabouts [so she has to let you stalk her in order for to get her
son back?], changes in circumstances, and provide updated contact information in a
timely manner,
-Secure and maintain adequate housing,
-Secure and maintain employment,
-Complete substance abuse evaluation and follow all recommendations,
-Refrain from using illegal drugs/substances,
-Complete random urine screens,
-Cooperate with VBDHS,
-Complete a budgeting and child safety class,
-Refrain from having inappropriate exposure of David or herself on social networks [This was addressed in court. Commonwealth requested that India not post pictures of her son on Facebook or other social networking sites. It was determined
that this was completely against her First Amendment rights and therefore
could not be granted. India's court order says she may exercise her First
Amendment right to the 'full extent of the law'],
-Consistently maintain the VBDHS binder that is provided, indicating ongoing process
toward goal achievement and
-Sign necessary releases [what does that even mean? What if she doesn't find it
necessary to sign over information about herself? Is she now 'non-compliant?]
Ms. Styles must be able to demonstrate the ability to care for David adequately, in a safe
and stable environment that is free from drugs, violence, abuse, and neglect. In addition,
she must successfully complete all recommended services and be able to consistently apply
what she has learned.
David's father is unknown to the agency. [The agency does, however, know that
India was raped, and whoever raped her is David's father. Please tell us now, how you would like him to be involved in David's life] Once the father is identified,
he will be included in the planning process and be assessed to determine service needs.
[Like jail?] Ms. Styles is to provide information for locating David's father [Seriously?],
relatives and sources for placement, permanent connections and community supports until
permanency is achieved.
b. List the services which will be provided which will address the needs
identified above, improve conditions of the parents' home and facilitate return
of the child home, movement into other permanent placement, or transition
to independence. Give target dates for completion.
1. Parent(s)/Prior Custodian(s) -
VBDHS will provide India Styles with visitation at VBDHS discretion. (ongoing)
VBDHS will keep India Styles informed of any changes in David's need, or changes in
David's physical health that may occur. (ongoing)
VBDHS will provide India Styles with a binder, to allow her to track her ongoing
progress toward goal achievement (May 2011) [this is a target date? a month
before you write this report? seriously?]
VBDHS will refer India Styles to the VBDHS child safety, clean and healthy homes
and budgeting workshops. (June 2011)
VBDHS will fund and refer India Styles for a full battery psychological and parenting
capacity evaluation. (June 2011)
VBDHS will refer to and fund parenting classes designed to educate, train, guide and
provide a better understanding of child development, needs of children, and
appropriate techniques to discipline children. (June 2011)
VBDHS will refer and fund a substance abuse evaluation. (June 2011)
2. Child/Youth -
VBDHS will refer David to Infant and Toddler for a developmental assessment. (ongoing)
VBDHS will monitor David's placement through worker visits and ongoing telephone
contacts. (ongoing)
VBDHS will attend all necessary case staffings and foster care reviews to address
David's progress and or concerns. (ongoing)
VBDHS will provide David with an annual clothing allowance and Virginia Medicaid.
(ongoing)
VBDHS will assist the foster parents with the coordination of any necessary services
which may be required to meet David's emotional and physical needs. (ongoing)
VBDHS will assess relatives and friends to determine the appropriateness of their
contact with him. (ongoing) [I've been asking to be 'assessed.' They keep telling
me my relationship with David is not a priority]
3. Foster Parent(s)/Adoptive Parent(s)/Residential Facility -
VBDHS will attend all necessary case staffings to address David's progress. (ongoing)
VBDHS will provide David with Virginia Medicaid coverage and clothing allowance.
(ongoing)
VBDHS will assist the foster parents with the coordination of any necessary services
which may be required to meet David's emotional and physical needs. (ongoing)
VBDHS will schedule all supervised visits and inform the foster parents of all visitation
dates. (ongoing) [At least they're telling someone when visitation is]
7. List responsiblities, including conduct and financial support, with target dates for completion for:
a. Parent(s)/Prior Custodian(s) -
India Styles will complete a parenting capacity evaluation with a psychological evaluation component to determine whether there are any levels of ability and/or impairment; and
comply with resulting recommendations,
-Attend scheduled supervised visits [none have been scheduled for her yet] to affirm
boundaries and healthy bonding and development, and abide by the guidelines and
expectations of the process,
India Styles will maintain regular contact with VBDHS, GAL and her counsel and keep the agency informed of her whereabouts, changes in circumstances, and provide updated contact information in a timely manner,
India Styles will secure and maintain adequate housing,
India Styles will seek, secure and maintain employment,
India Styles will complete substance abuse evaluation and follow all recommendations,
India Styles will refrain from using illegal drugs and/or misuse/abuse of substances,
India Styles will complete random urine screens,
India Styles will cooperate with VBDHS,
India Styles will complete VBDHS workshops: budgeting, clean and healthy homes and child safety,
India Styles will refrain from having inappropriate exposure of David or herself on social networks [we just went over this],
India Styles will consistently maintain the VBDHS binder that is provided, recording and indicating her ongoing progress toward goal achievement,
India Styles will sign necessary releases, and
India Styles will demonstrate appropriate parental judgement and behavior to insure
consistent safety and well being for herself and her child.
Ms. Styles must be able to demonstrate the ability to care for David adequately, in a safe
and stable environment that is free from drugs, violence, abuse, and neglect. In addition,
she must successfully complete all recommended services and be able to consistently apply
what she has learned.
David's father is unknown to the agency. Once the father is identified,
he will be included in the planning process and be assessed to determine service needs.
Ms. Styles is to provide information for locating David's father, relatives and sources for placement, permanent connections and community supports until permanency is achieved.
b. Child/Youth -
N/A
c. Foster Parent(s)/Adoptive Parent(s)/Residential Facility:
Foster parents will keep the social worker informed of any changes in David's needs, physical health, or any changes in the placement which would affect David's best interests.
(ongoing)
Foster parents will cooperate and work collaboratively with VBDHS. (ongoing)
Foster parents shall refrain from initiating or allowing any contact with David's biological
family without consulting VBDHS. (ongoing) [So if they are dropping David off for a visit, India can't be introduced to the people caring for her son?]
Foster parents will provide David with transportation to all medical and other necessary
appointments. (ongoing)
Foster parents will provide David with a safe, stable, and nurturing home. (0ngoing)
Foster parents will attend FAPT [that stands for Family Assessment Planning Team which is usually what India should be attending. I don't know why it's different
in this case...] and Court hearings, when requested. (ongoing0
The following persons were involved in planning:
-Parent(s)/Prior Custodian(s) [India was not asked to be involved with this plan at all]
-Foster Parent(s) or Care Providers
If parent(s)/prior custodian(s) not involved, explain why.
[Still waiting on an explanation]
Signed by Sharon Hosea (Worker) and Ophelia Wattley (Supervisor) on 6/24/11
Okay. So that's it folks. The entire report...I hope you can see the lies and inconsistencies. This is truly breaking my heart, my spirits, but...I'll fight on.
REVOLT
Thank you to everyone who is trying to be supportive of David's safe return.
ReplyDeleteI hope and pray that the kidnappers will be brought to justice. But, I don"t
think that it will happen in the current venue which is improper.
They say that the printed word is WORD...Law- to be recognized; but what happens when some trusted official changes the court order? Are we to question each and every person that was a witness to the original as though they could have anything to do with the mishap? Or should we question and investigate the person or persons who would gain from such an infraction? I say the latter.
ReplyDeleteI just came across an official Virginia Beach Circuit Court record that I believe has been changed and not by an appeal. When Patty first showed the record, I immediately was akeen to the fact that some thing was wrong. I am going to go to the Clerk of Court Tina Sinen and see what she proposes. I am writing this because my life is in danger. I told my so-called court appointed attorney Cassandra McLaughin, Judge Benson; the Hampton Courts but no one seems to care.
When they took David he was normal, now he is delayed with hearing loss; an operation to drain fluid from the head trauma he suffered in foster care, speech or delays in talking and recognizance and ...CAN ANYONE WONDER WHY I WILL NOT PROTEST TO HIS PROTECTIVE CUSTODY?
for all that has happened to him he should own a piece of virginia but they won't even let him out of foster care for a chance at life with his family because they have to have control of his family in order to suppressed the truth of the information.
This is VIRGINIA PRISONER signing out.